Light ROM 4/Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso/text/maillist/1994/sep94.doc/000533_owner-lightwave-l _Tue Sep 20 09:34:20 1994.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-03-23 | 2KB

Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)     id IAA02570; Tue, 20 Sep 1994 08:11:36 -0700
Received: from cais.cais.com by mail3.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)     id IAA02536; Tue, 20 Sep 1994 08:11:24 -0700
Received: from cais2.cais.com (cais2.cais.com [199.0.216.200]) by cais.cais.com (8.6.5/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA23449 for <[e-mail]>; Tue, 20 Sep 1994 11:03:39 -0400
Received: from localhost (jlfitz@localhost) by cais2.cais.com (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA29964; Tue, 20 Sep 1994 11:11:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 1994 11:11:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: "JLFITZ@cais" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Do Fractal Clouds Need AA?
To: [e-mail]
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [e-mail]


   With a way cool scene of fractal noise clouds rolling across the sky,
I have a question: Does anti-aliasing greatly affect the final results,
even on something such as fractal noise?  I did a check render with the
MED RES / LOW AA and the frame rendered at about 45 minutes. That's a bit
to long for me (I want about 10 seconds of motion, and don't want to wait
until Christmas for it to finish).

   I remember that there was some talk regarding things like this a while
back, but don't remember the outcome...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          Jeffrey L. Fitzgerald
                             [e-mail]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       * Real Life On-Line Help 24 Hrs a Day...    [e-mail] *